Latest News

Annual Report 2018 Published

The annual activity report of the SCCER HaE is available now on our web site. The Swiss Competence Center for Energy Research (SCCER) Heat and Electricity Storage is now in the middle of its second phase.

In this report, a detailed summary of our activities and achievements from 2018 can be found, giving our interested readers from academia, industry, and politics an overview of our successful operation. Following the lines of our technical roadmap, our progress reached new and highest standards. We invite you to explore the achievements of the 25 groups of the SCCER presented in our Annual Report 2018 (hig res.) or ( low res.). If you prefer, there are also carbon copies available upon request.

More news: click on News Archive


Note: the language of the description corresponds to the language of the event. 
           [Click on event for more information.]

2nd Swiss & Surrounding Battery Days on August 26-18, 2019 in Dübendorf, CH

UK Energy Storage Conference 2019 on September 3-5, 2019 in Newcastle, UK

8th SCCER Heat and Electricity Storage Symposium on November 6, 2019 at Empa in Dübendorf, CH

The Swiss Competence Center for Heat and Electricity Storage

The SCCER HaE is dedicated to energy storage research and the first three years were completed successfully and the second funding period till 2020 has begun. It is about time now to report some highlights from the different fields of research of the SCCER. The energy turnaround, replacing fossil and nuclear by renewable sources, is facilitated if energy storage solutions become available in line with the progress of the transition towards renewable energy sources. During Phase I (2014-2016) of the SCCER Heat and Electricity Storage a variety of storage technologies were investigated. Among the different research projects, the following examples show extraordinary potential to become relevant within the scope of ES 2050 and therefore selected as highlights of Phase I of the SCCER HaE.


Like in fuel cells, the redox flow cell is supplied with fuel (electrolyte) form external. Like an accumulator the process is fully reversible in one device. Since the electrolytes are in liquid phase, storing them is straight forward (plastic containers can do the job). However, the down side of RFB is a low energy density and the relatively low energy efficiency of (80-85%) compared to other batteries. This limits the use of RFB to niche applications so far, but makes them interesting for research. During phase I of the SCCER Hae, an idea was formulated: If the redox couple were Cerium III/IV combined with Vanadium II/III as electrolytes, a parallel catalytic reaction can produce hydrogen and oxygen, thus the cell can do electrolysis once the electrolyte is fully charged. This is interesting for processes which require a continuous stream of hydrogen, like biogas upgrading at waste water treatment plants. More details are available in the SCCER HaE Annual Activity Report 2016, p. 37-38 .


The growing share of fluctuating renewable energy sources like wind and solar requires short- and long-term energy storage to guarantee the power supply. Pumped hydro storage is at present the main option for large-scale storage. Electricity Storage systems based on pumped hydro are available since little more than 100 years and the massive capacity build up started in the 1970’s. Therefore the best locations for such installations are already explored. One promising alternative to pumped hydro storage is advanced adiabatic compressed air energy storage (AA-CAES) with an estimated round-trip efficiency of more than 70%. In Phase I, a demonstration plant was commissioned. The close collaboration of three research groups and the industrial partner enabled the fast progress, supported by project funding from the CTI SCCER- and the NRP 70 programme. More details are available in the SCCER HaE Annual Activity Report 2016, p. 5-9.


Many concepts for energy storage exist on paper, on material level and lab scale devices. The assessment of the concepts in terms of their suitability for everyday use can be done only on demonstrators of power and capacities of about 1/100 to 1/10 below the real application. Two of such demonstrators are described in separate highlights (AA-CAES and RFB with Hydrogen production and the hydrogen filling station). Within the SCCER, three more demonstrator projects can be reported. Already at the beginning of Phase I the 25 KW power to gas plant at the HSR in Rapperswil was put into operation and two years of experience with this plant was gathered. The energy system integration platform (ESI), an installation with increased complexity was commissioned in phase I of the SCCER. Here, the interplay of different conversion type storage systems is explored on a 100kW scale. More details are available in the SCCER HaE Annual Activity Report 2016, p. 63-66.



Batteries are the most energy efficient way to store electricity since no transition between energy carriers take place. Therefore it is the first storage option when it comes to store surplus electricity. For stationary use, weight and volume constraints on batteries are less demanding than for mobile applications, therefore a reduced lower power density is acceptable if there is a cost advantage associated. Due to the abundance of sodium in the Earth’s crust, sodium ion (Na-ion) batteries could be a more economical alternative to lithium-ion (Li-ion) batteries. In phase I of the SCCER, it was possible to work out the special needs of the Na –ion battery chemistry and a first full cell based on abundant low cost materials was tested. More details are available in the SCCER HaE Annual Activity Report 2016, p. 24-26 .


In terms of grid scale storage options, the question remains how to deal with surplus electricity (once all the available high efficiency storage options are loaded). Can one afford to allow for curtailment shall the energy stored in a chemical compound at a lower efficiency but for long time scales. The later becomes an interesting option if seasonal or transportation aspects are considered. Also organic chemistry, not relying on fossil feedstock, becomes an option if the conversion process of CO2 and H2O to CH4 or other low molecular hydrocarbons (e.g. methanol or formic acid) is mastered in an efficient manner., Thereby a coupling of the sectors transportation and chemistry with electricity is possible, as well as long term energy storage. The proof of principle for a direct electrochemical conversion was presented during phase one, including economic considerations for identifying the best product (formic acid and methanol, was found to be economically most interesting together with CO). More details are available in the SCCER HaE Annual Activity Report 2016, p. 53-57 .


Besides of all the technical solutions for energy storage, whether they are state of the art or exist only in concepts, the economic, regulatory legal and environmental aspects are key for future implementation of storage in the energy grid. In phase I the system assessment group (a collaboration of three institutes) developed the tools necessary to conduct studies on economic and environmental scenario around energy storage technology. A comprehensive study on different storage options in terms of their costs and greenhouse gas emissions are the highlight of phase I. A ranking for storage options, depending on cycle time is given. At a system size of 1 MW, for short (<1 min) term storage battery systems are most economic and associates with the least greenhouse gas emissions, while for medium term storage (day), battery is still advantageous in terms of cost, but not in terms of greenhouse gas emissions, Batteries fall behind pumped hydro and adiabatic air storage Also a closer look behind the economics of power to gas revealed that only methane or even hydrogen production is economically not viable. Only if additional services can be sold, the business case is positive. More details are available in the SCCER HaE Annual Activity Report 2016, p. 59-62 .